Art criticism discourse: specificity and classification
https://doi.org/10.26907/2658-3321.2022.5.3.346–359
Keywords:
language, functions of language, interpretation, dualism, institutional type, art criticism discourseAbstract
This article is devoted to the specifics of art historical discourse. The article emphasizes and substantiates the idea that the interpretive nature of this discourse and its dualistic nature are the main characteristics of art historical discourse. Attention is drawn to the growing interest in the study of this type of discourse, its relevance as an intersectoral direction is emphasized and its (art historical discourse) features, classification and linguistic functions are analyzed. In the course of the study, an analysis of the theoretical material of leading Russian scientists - linguists in the studied discursion field was carried out. The main direction of research is structuring the available data on the features and classification of this discourse and understanding its nature. The empirical basis of the study consists of various fragments of art history discourse in all its stylistic diversity. This study raises the topic of the relevance of interest in the field of art and, as a result, in art history discourse.
References
References
Arslanov V.G. Theory and history of art history. XX century. Formal school. M.: Akademicheskiy proect; 2015. 380 p. (In Russ.)
Elina E.A. Verbal interpretations of works of fine art: authorship thesis of Doctor of Philology. V.: Volgograd State Pedagogical University; 2003. P.8. (In Russ.)
Riffaterre M. Essais de stylistique structurale. Translated with an Introduction by Daniel Delas. Paris: Flammarion; 1971. 364 p. (In Fren.)
Thoric V.I. Linguoculturology and intercultural communication: a textbook for university stu-dents, studying in the specialty 021700 – “Philology”, specialization “Foreign Philology”. M.: GIS; 2006. P. 258. (In Russ.)
Boldirev N.N. Interpretive language function. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo Gosudarstvennogo Uni-versiteta. Vipusk 60 Philologiya. Isskustvovedenie = Bulleti of the Chelyabinsk State University. Rel. 60. Philology. Art criticism: Ch. 2011;(33):11. (In Russ.)
Introduced by V. Volodarsky. The Tretyakov Gallery Painting. L.: Aurora Art Publishers; 1979. 544p.
Roose H., Roose W., Daenekindt S. Trends in contemporary art discourse. Cultural Sociology. 2018. 12 (3). Available from: http//www.researchgate.net [accessed 30.01.2022].
Accumulative (cumulative) language function. Available from: https//studme.org/243534/literature/akkumulyativnaya_kumulyativnaya_funktsiya_yazuka [accessed 15.01.2022]. (In Russ.)
SavinaА., Trabun D. You can’t do it: 10 Modern Art Works and Instructions. Available from: https://www.lookatme.ru [accessed 19.01.2021]. (In Russ.)
Karasik V.I. About types of discourse. Language personality: institutional and personal dis-course: Collection of scientific papers. Volgograd: Peremena; 2000. P.5-20. (In Russ.)
Sahno A.A. Cognitive-pragmatic (semiotic) features of verbalized non-verbal components of communication in a literary text: authorship thesis of candidate of Philological Sciences. Maykop: Adyghe State University; 2013. P. 22. (In Russ.)
Piotrovskaya L.A. Emotiveness and deixis: sb. Dokladov. SPb Ros. gosudarstvennyi pedago-gicheskii un-t im. A. I. Herzen; 1993. P.5. (In Russ.)
Cheredina A.U. Linguistic actualization of emotivity in contemporary art criticism discourse. Final qualifying work SPb: Sankt-Peterburgskii gosudarstvennyi un-t; 2017. P.19. (In Russ.)
Edited by A.I. Leonova. Russian Art. Essays on the life and work of artists. The first half of the XIX century. М.: State publishing house Art; 1954. 305p., 565p. (In Russ.)
Kuznetsova L.V. Linguocultural Markers of the World of Childhood in English-Language Art History Discourse: Thesis. ... candidate Philology Sciences. Samara: Samars. Nation. Studies. un-t imeni akad. S.P. Koroleva; 2018. P.26. (In Russ.)
Yakobson R.O. Functions of the language according to R.O. Yakobson. Available from: http//www.studbooks.net [accessed 03.12.2021]. (In Russ.)
Erohina A.B. Pragmalingvistic aspects of contemporary art criticism discourse:(on the material of English-language texts devoted to fine arts): Thesis of candidate of philological sciences. Mos-cow: Moscow Lomonosov State University; 2018. P.13. (In Russ.)
Rosenberg H. The De-definition of Art. N-Y.: Collier Books; 1972. 268 p.
Belmesova M.O. Key features of art criticism discourse within the framework of the textual ac-tualization of the English linguistic and cultural concept “PAINTING” (based on the monograph by G. Reynolds “TURNER. WORLD OF ART”). Yuzhno-Ural State University. Linguistics series. 2016;(13):62. (In Russ.)
Danilenko A.P. Linguoculturological features of art criticism discourse: Master’s Thesis Belgo-rod: Belgorod State National research University; 2019. P.21. (In Russ.)
