Intertext in media analytics: pragmatics of translation
Keywords:
intertextuality, intertext, allusion, analytical article on legal issues, media discourse, legal discourse, media analyticsAbstract
The article examines the forms of intertextuality in the genre of analytical article on legal issues, which is a product of the interaction of media discourse as a basic one and legal discourse as a projective one. In analytical articles on legal issues, intertextuality, as a rule, is manifested in references to other analytical articles, information materials, reports, interviews, where the topic is covered in more detail, as well as in references to various regulatory legal acts, documents, court decisions, precedents, to legal doctrine provisions, etc. The forms of intertextuality in analytical articles on legal issues are conditioned by the discursive characteristics of the genre. Based on the narrow understanding of intertextuality as a manifestation of explicit references to specific texts, the author proposes a conditional division into implicit (requiring additional knowledge and creative thinking in the decoding process) and explicit (obvious to the recipient without thoughtful reading, graphically marked) forms of intertextuality in the genre of analytical article on legal issues. The paper considers examples from English-language analytical articles on legal issues illustrating various forms of intertextuality from the point of view of translation pragmatics. The author emphasizes the relevance of studying explicit forms of intertextuality as a promising area of research in the field of discourse with the possibility of using information technologies and machine algorithms.
References
Список литературы
Арнольд И.В. Семантика. Стилистика. Интертекстуальность. СПб. Изд-во Санкт-Петербург. ун-та, 1999. 448 с.
Баженова Е.А. Способы экспликации и функции чужой речи в научном тексте. Функциональные разновидности речи в коммуникативном аспекте. Пермь, 1988. С. 83–91.
Барт Р. От произведения к тексту. Избранные работы: Семиотика: Поэтика. М.: Прогресс, 1989. С. 413–424.
Бахтин М.М. Вопросы литературы и эстетики: Исследования разных лет. М.: Художественная литература, 1975. 502 с.
Безруков А.Н. Поэтика интертекстуальности: Учебное пособие. Бирск: Бирск. гос. соц.-пед. академия, 2005. 70 с.
Белоглазова Е.В. Дискурсность, интердискурсность, полидискурсность литературы для детей. СПб.: Изд-во СПбГУЭФ, 2010. 196 с.
Васильев А.Д. Интертекстуальность: прецедентные феномены: учебное пособие. М.: Флинта: Наука, 2015. 341 с.
Гончарова Е.А. К вопросу об изучении категории «автор» через проблемы интертекстуальности. Интертекстуальные связи в художественном тексте. СПб.: Образование, 1993. С. 20–28.
Ильин И.П. Стилистика интертекстуальности; Теоретические аспекты. Проблемы современной стилистики. М., 1989. С. 186–207.
Интертекстуальность и фигуры интертекста в дискурсах разных типов: коллективная монография [В. П. Москвин и др.]; [науч. ред: Колокольцева Т.Н., Москвин В.П.]. М.: ФЛИНТА: Наука, 2016. 347 с.
Исаков В.Б. Право на аналитику. Гражданин. Выборы. Власть. 2018. № 4. С. 116–135.
Кожина М.Н. Диалогичность письменной научной речи как проявление социальной сущности языка. Методика и лингвистика иностранного языка для научных работников. М.: Наука, 1981. С. 248.
Кристева Ю. Текст романа. Кристева Ю. Избранные труды: Разрушение поэтики. пер. с фр. Г.К. Козикова, Б.П. Нарумова. М.: РОССПЭН, 2004. С. 395–593.
Кузьмина Н.А. Интертекст и его роль в процессах функционирования поэтического языка. Екатеринбург; Омск, 1999. 268 c.
Курносов Ю.В., Конотопов П.Ю. Аналитика: методология, технология и организация информационно-аналитической работы. М.: Русаки, 2004. 512 с.
Лотман Ю.М. Текст в тексте. Текст в тексте. Труды по знаковым системам. Вып. 14. Тарту, 1981. С. 3–18.
Фатеева Н.А. Контрапункт интертекстуальности, или интертекст в мире текстов. М.: Агар, 2000. 280 с.
Федеральный закон от 23.08.1996 N 127-ФЗ (ред. от 08.12.2020) «О науке и государственной научно-технической политике». КонсультантПлюс // URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_11507/ (дата обращения: 14.01.2021).
Филиппова С.Г. Интертекстуальность как средство объективации картины мира автора: дисс. на соискание уч. степени д-ра. филол. наук. СПб., 2008. 449 с.
Чернявская В.Е. Интертекстуальность как текстообразующая категория в научной коммуникации: на материале немецкого языка: дисс. на соискание уч. степени д-ра. филол. наук. М., 2000. 449 с.
Forget Antitrust Laws. To Limit Tech, Some Say a New Regulator Is Needed. The New York Times // URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/22/technology/antitrust-laws-tech-new-regulator.html?action=click&auth=login-facebook&module=Well&pgtype=Homepage§ion=Business (дата обращения:10.02.2021).
Google, You Can’t Buy Your Way Out of This. The New York Times // URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/22/opinion/google-lawsuit-antitrust.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage (дата обращения: 07.02.2021).
Holthuis S. Intertextualität. Aspekte einer rezeptionsorientierten Konzeption. Tübingen: Stauftengurg Verlag, 1993. S. 268.
Lachman R. Gedächtnis und Literatur. Intertextalität in der russischen Moderne. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. 1990.
Lachman R. Intertextualität als Sinnkonstruktion. Poetica. 1983. H. 15. S. 66–107.
Mr Kandahar: Sayed Jalal Agha wants to make Afghanistan great again. TRT World // URL: https://www.trtworld.com/magazine/mr-kandahar-sayed-jalal-agha-wants-to-make-afghanistan-great-again-43084 (дата обращения: 10.01.2021).
Pfister M., Broich U. Konzepte der Intertextualitat. Intertextualitat: Formen, Funktionen, anglistische Fallstudien. Tubingen, 1985. S. 1–30.
Riffaterre M. La trace de l’intertexte. La Pensee: Revue du rationalisme moderne. 1980. Vol. 215.
The coronavirus outbreak is making expertise great again. The Washington Post // URL: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/03/09/coronavirus-outbreak-is-making-expertise-great-again/ (дата обращения: 12.02.2021).
The Guardian view on Boris Johnson in Europe: warmer words but a cold reality. The Guardian // URL: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/aug/22/the-guardian-view-on-boris-johnson-in-europe-warmer-words-but-a-cold-reality (дата обращения: 10.02.2021).
Trump’s attacks on political adversaries are often followed by threats to their safety. The Washington Post // URL: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/threats-follow-trump-poliical-attacks/2020/10/28/c6dbce02-1792-11eb-82db-60b15c874105_story.html (дата обращения: 07.02.2021).
References
Arnol'd I.V. (1999). Semantics. Style. Intertextuality. St. Petersburg, Izd-vo Sankt-Peterburg. un-ta. 448 p. (In Russian)
Bazhenova E.A. (1988). Ways of Explication and Functions of Foreign Speech in a Scientific Text. Functional Varieties of Speech in the Communicative Aspect. Perm', pp. 83–91. (In Russian)
Barthes R. (1989). From the Work to the Text. Selected Works: Semiotics: Poetics. Moscow, Progress, pp. 413–424. (In Russian)
Bakhtin M.M. (1975). Issues of Literature and Aesthetics: Studies of Different Years. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya literatura. 502 p. (In Russian)
Bezrukov A.N. (2005). Poetics of Intertextuality: Study Guide. Birsk, Birsk. gos. sots.-ped. akademiya. 70 p. (In Russian)
Beloglazova E.V. (2010). Discursivity, Interdiscursivity, Polydiscursivity of Literature for Children. St. Petersburg, Izd-vo SPbGUEF. 196 p. (In Russian)
Vasil'ev A.D. (2015). Intertextuality: Precedent Phenomena. Study Guide. Moscow, Flinta, Nauka. 341 p. (In Russian)
Goncharova E.A. (1993). On the Issue of Studying the Category “Author” Through the Problems of Intertextuality. Intertextual Connections in a Literary Text. St. Petersburg, Obrazovanie, pp. 20–28. (In Russian)
Il'in I.P. (1989). Stylistics of Intertextuality; Theoretical Aspects. Problems of Modern Stylistics. Moscow, pp. 186–207. (In Russian)
Intertextuality and Intertext Figures in Discourses of Different Types. Collective Monograph [Moskvin V.P., Kolokol'tseva T.N. et al.]. (2016). Moscow, FLINTA, Nauka. 347 p. (In Russian)
Isakov V.B. (2018). The Right to of Analytics. Citizen. Elections. Authority. 2018. № 4, pp. 116–135. (In Russian)
Kozhina M.N. (1981). Dialogicity of Written Scientific Speech as a Manifestation of The Social Essence of Language. Methods and Linguistics of a Foreign Language for Researchers. Moscow, Nauka, p. 248. (In Russian)
Kristeva Yu. (2004). Text of the Novel. Kristeva Yu. Selected Works. Destruction of Poetics. Translated from Fr. by G.K. Kozikova, B.P. Narumova. Moscow, ROSSPEN, pp. 395–593. (In Russian)
Kuz'mina N.A. (1999). Intertext and Its Role in the Processes of Functioning of the Poetic Language. Yekaterinburg, Omsk. 268 p. (In Russian)
Kurnosov Yu.V., Konotopov P.Yu. (2004). Analytics: Methodology, Technology and Organization of Information and Analytical Work. Moscow, Rusaki. 512 p. (In Russian)
Lotman Yu.M. (1981). Text Within the Text. Text Within the Text. Works on Sign Systems. Vyp. 14. Tartu, pp. 3–18. (In Russian)
Fateeva N.A. (2000). Counterpoint of Intertextuality, or Intertext in the World of Texts. Moscow, Agar. 280 p. (In Russian)
Federal Law No. 127-FZ of August 23, 1996 (as amended on December 8, 2020) “On Science and State Scientific and Technical Policy”. KonsultantPlyus // URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_11507/ (accessed: 14 January 2021). (In Russian)
Filippova S.G. (2008). Intertextuality as a Means of Objectification of the Author's Picture of the World. Dr. philol. sci. diss. St. Petersburg. 449 p. (In Russian)
Chernyavskaya V.E. (2000). Intertextuality as a text-forming category in scientific communication: Based on the German language. Dr. philol. sci. diss. Moscow. 449 p. (In Russian)
Forget Antitrust Laws. To Limit Tech, Some Say a New Regulator Is Needed. The New York Times // URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/22/technology/antitrust-laws-tech-new-regulator.html?action=click&auth=login-facebook&module=Well&pgtype=Homepage§ion=Business (accessed: 10 February 2021). (In English)
Google, You Can’t Buy Your Way Out of This. The New York Times // URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/22/opinion/google-lawsuit-antitrust.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage (accessed: 7 February 2021). (In English)
Holthuis S. (1993). Intertextualität. Aspekte einer rezeptionsorientierten Konzeption. Tübingen: Stauftengurg Verlag, S. 268. (In German)
Lachman R. (1990). Gedächtnis und Literatur. Intertextalität in der russischen Moderne. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. (In German)
Lachman R. (1983). Intertextualität als Sinnkonstruktion. Poetica. H. 15, S. 66–107. (In German)
Mr Kandahar: Sayed Jalal Agha wants to make Afghanistan great again. TRT World // URL: https://www.trtworld.com/magazine/mr-kandahar-sayed-jalal-agha-wants-to-make-afghanistan-great-again-43084 (accessed: 10 January 2021). (In English)
Pfister M. (1985). Konzepte der Intertextualitat. Intertextualitat: Formen, Funktionen, anglistische Fallstudien / Hrsg. U. Broich & M. Pfister. Tubingen, S. 1–30. (In German)
Riffaterre M. (1980). La trace de l’intertexte. La Pensee: Revue du rationalisme moderne. Vol. 215. (In French)
The coronavirus outbreak is making expertise great again. The Washington Post // URL: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/03/09/coronavirus-outbreak-is-making-expertise-great-again/ (accessed: 12 February 2021). (In English)
The Guardian view on Boris Johnson in Europe: warmer words but a cold reality. The Guardian // URL: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/aug/22/the-guardian-view-on-boris-johnson-in-europe-warmer-words-but-a-cold-reality (accessed: 10 February 2021). (In English)
Trump’s attacks on political adversaries are often followed by threats to their safety. The Washington Post // URL: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/threats-follow-trump-poliical-attacks/2020/10/28/c6dbce02-1792-11eb-82db-60b15c874105_story.html (accessed: 7 February 2021). (In English)
